Connect Epsilon3 to NetSuite with AI
Epsilon3 knows what your hardware went through: which procedures ran, which steps consumed which parts, which anomalies interrupted a test campaign. NetSuite knows what all of it cost and what is left on the shelf. At space and defense-adjacent companies these two systems describe the same physical reality from opposite ends — and the people who need both views (test conductors deciding whether to proceed, ops planning spares) get neither without asking two other teams.
bomrail puts both behind one MCP endpoint so an AI agent can answer the joined questions: whether there are enough spares in NetSuite to survive another anomaly like yesterday’s; what a failed test campaign consumed in parts and dollars; which upcoming procedures depend on items NetSuite shows as back-ordered. Reads on both sides, every call logged, nothing written to either system.
This is the least traditional pairing bomrail supports, and deliberately so: nobody builds an Epsilon3-to-NetSuite connector, because there is no record type to sync. There are only questions that span both — which is exactly the shape of problem an agent with tools handles better than a pipeline.
What becomes answerable
bomrail exposes both systems as read-only MCP tools. These are the joins an agent can make on demand:
Procedure part consumption
Parts consumed in Epsilon3 runs valued against NetSuite costs — what a test campaign actually burned.
Spares coverage
Anomaly-driven consumption rates from Epsilon3 checked against NetSuite on-hand and on-order spares.
Procedure readiness
Upcoming Epsilon3 procedures cross-checked with NetSuite availability for the items their steps require.
Anomaly cost context
When an anomaly scraps hardware, the NetSuite replacement cost and lead time attached to the anomaly report.
Example: can we absorb another failure?
A thermal-vac campaign has burned two heater assemblies to anomalies in a week. Before authorizing the next run, the test conductor asks: "If we lose another heater assembly, can we finish the campaign on schedule?" The agent pulls consumption from the Epsilon3 run history, checks NetSuite: one assembly on the shelf, two on a PO with a six-week lead time, campaign needs three more runs. Answer: one more failure is absorbable; two stalls the campaign into the PO lead time — and the PO has not been released yet.
The unreleased PO is the finding that changes someone’s afternoon. It surfaced because the agent could follow the question across systems instead of stopping at "one on the shelf."
Frequently asked questions
Our Epsilon3 data is export-controlled. Can we use this at all?
Not on the hosted multitenant plan — that is a deliberate line. The self-hosted bomrail deployment runs entirely inside your VPC or on-prem perimeter for exactly this case: same MCP tools, your infrastructure, no data leaving your boundary.
How does the agent know which parts a procedure consumed?
From Epsilon3’s own run records, where steps reference parts and serial numbers. The agent then resolves those part numbers against NetSuite items. Where your procedures reference parts loosely (free-text step notes), matches are flagged as inferred.
Is there any writing back — say, opening a NetSuite requisition after an anomaly?
Not by default; both connections are read-only. A "draft requisition for human approval" action is the kind of scoped write the Growth plan can enable later, but the launch scope for this pairing is answers, not actions.
When is this pairing available?
Both connectors are in the design-partner tier. This pairing exists on the roadmap because space-adjacent teams asked for it — if that is you, the waitlist form with "Epsilon3 + NetSuite" in the stack field is the strongest possible vote.